Legal Opinion

Freudenberger v. Allstate Insurance

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 19, 1996No. 96-0452-IEG (LSP)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ALLSTATE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. #5]

GONZALEZ, District Judge.

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment came on regularly for hearing in Courtroom 13 of this Court, the Honorable Irma E. Gonzalez, District Judge, presiding. James A. Testa, Esq. of Testa & Associates appeared on behalf of plaintiffs Grace & Victor Freudenberger. Charles A. Danaher, Esq. of Luce Forward Hamilton & Seripps appeared on behalf of defendant Allstate Insurance Company.

BACKGROUND

Judgment creditors Grace and Victor Freudenberger seek through a “direct action” pursuant to Insurance…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. FosterColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Mezzetti v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
  3. Reshamwalla v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2000
  4. Ackerman v. FosterColorado Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API