Legal Opinion

Mezzetti v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 18, 2004No. C 04-03022 JWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

WARE, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant State Farm Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) moves to dismiss three of Plaintiff Susan Mezzetti’s (“Mezzetti”) five causes of action. In resolving State Farm’s motion, this Court decides two important issues of insurance law.

First, is a lawsuit against an insurer, brought under section 11580(b)(2) of the California Insurance Code, to collect on a judgment secured against the insurer’s insured, a “direct action” under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1), in which case, for diversity of citizenship purposes, the insured’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
  2. Jones v. State Farm General Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  3. Pollock v. Federal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API