State v. Bennett
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Per curiam
Carlo Bennett was 16 years old when he pleaded guilty to taking a motor vehicle without permission. Four years later, the State alleged Bennett failed to pay restitution and sought modification of the disposition order. The juvenile court modified the disposition and, over Bennett’s objection, extended its jurisdiction beyond his 21st birthday. The court’s retroactive application of 1994 amendments authorizing such an extension was consistent with the rehabilitative goals of the juvenile system and did not violate Bennett’s right to due process. We affirm.
FACTS
The following is a summary of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. McClendonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- State v. K.H.-H.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. TejadaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- State v. AMRCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. D.P.G.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.