State v. Jacobsen
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
— Terry L. Jacobsen moved for accelerated review of the manifest injustice disposition imposed following his juvenile court adjudication of guilt of two counts of child molestation in the first degree. Jacobsen argues (1) the court-ordered psychological and polygraph tests violated his constitutional protection against self-incrimination, and (2) the trial court abused its discretion by imposing a manifest injustice disposition. We affirm.
FACTS
Terry Jacobsen appeals a Pierce County Superior Court, Juvenile Department, disposition in excess of the Juvenile Justice Act standard range. The…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- In re the Dependency of Q.L.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. Diaz-CardonaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. Diaz-CardonaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.