Legal Opinion

State v. Rice

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1983No. 48374-4, 48375-2PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

Defendants Daniel Rice and Monte Sanchez appeal the length of terms of confinement in disposition orders issued by the juvenile division of the Superior Court. The issues raised on appeal are twofold: first, whether the Legislature intended that juvenile dispositions under RCW 13.40 may include terms of confinement which exceed the maximum sentences allowed by RCW 9A.20.020; second, if the Legislature so intended, whether confining juveniles for periods longer than the maximum allowed for *386adults violates the equal protection clauses of the United States and Washington Constitutions. We hold…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Darrin v. GouldWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Tommy P. v. Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. State v. BrettWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. CoriaWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. SchaafWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. O'DAY v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 2003

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API