Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Heller

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 1922No. Civ. No. 3957PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Action to recover damages for injuries alleged to have resulted from negligence of the defendant in extracting a tooth of the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the judgment.

On the ninth day of August, 1918, appellant was a dentist, who at that time and for a number of years prior thereto practiced exclusively the extraction of teeth. The work done on that day by the defendant for the plaintiff consisted in the removal of a small piece of tooth which had been left in the upper left jaw from a tooth that had been extracted, and in the extraction of the wisdom tooth in the lower left jaw.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perkins v. TruebloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Wilbur v. Emergency Hospital Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Singer v. MarxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Ley v. BishoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Carbone v. WarburtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Donoho v. RawleighCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API