Legal Opinion

Donoho v. Rawleigh

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 7, 1929PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Rees

— Reversing.

This action was brought by appellee, who was the plaintiff below, to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by her by reason of the malpractice of the defendant as a dentist. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $2,000 and judgment was rendered for that amount. Defendant appeals.

The plaintiff had what is called and designated by dentists as an impacted wisdom tooth, or third molar, on the right side of the lower jaw. This wisdom tooth had not grown out so as to be free of the tooth in front of it, but had grown…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Perkins v. TruebloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Kuehnemann v. BoydWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hopkins v. HellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Vale v. NoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Miller v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Johnson v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
  2. Stacy v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Butts v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  4. Quickstad v. TavennerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Mitchell v. AtkinsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API