Legal Opinion
Roman v. Ashcroft
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 6, 2001No. 1:01CV1236PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The respondents (“the government”) have moved to dismiss for want of personal jurisdiction and for improper venue (docket no. 14). 2 For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss for want of personal jurisdiction is granted in part and denied in part, and the motion to dismiss for improper venue is denied.
BACKGROUND
The petitioner, Julio Roman, is a national of the Dominican Republic. His status was adjusted to that of a lawful permanent resident on October 29, 1996. On September 30, 1999, he was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Walker v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Johnson v. EisentragerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Julio E. Roman v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Luis L. Armentero v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Padilla Ex Rel. Newman v. BushDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Sanchez-Penunuri v. LongshoreDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- Castillo-Hernandez v. LongshoreDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.