Legal Opinion

United States v. Hayman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 7, 1952No. 23PublishedCited by 1,023 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Vinson

In its 19.48 revision of the Judicial Code, Congress provided that prisoners in custody under sentence of a fe'd eral court may move the sentencing court ot “Vacate, set aside or correct any sentence subject to collateral attack. 28 U. S. C. (Supp. IV) § 2255.

Respondent, confined, at the McNeil Island penitentiary in the Western District of Washington, 2 invoked this new procedure by filing a motion to vacate his sentence and grant a new trial in the District Court for the Southern District of California. That court had imposed a sentence of twenty years’ imprisonment in 1947 for forging…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,023 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

1,018 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API