Legal Opinion

Luis L. Armentero v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 26, 2003No. 02-55368PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERZON, Circuit Judge.

Luis Armentero, an excludable alien, contends that his potentially indefinite detention by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) is unlawful under Zadvydas v. INS, 533 U.S. 678, 121 S.Ct. 2491, 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001), as interpreted by this court’s decision in Xi v. INS, 298 F.3d 832 (9th Cir.2002). The INS is named as sole respondent in Armentero’s habeas petition. We do not reach the merits of the habeas petition because we conclude that the INS is not an appropriate respondent in these proceedings. We therefore remand to the district court with…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Ortiz-Sandoval v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Rasul v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. John Doe v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. Saravia v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  5. Padilla v. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API