Luis L. Armentero v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BERZON, Circuit Judge.
Luis Armentero, an excludable alien, contends that his potentially indefinite detention by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) is unlawful under Zadvydas v. INS, 533 U.S. 678, 121 S.Ct. 2491, 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001), as interpreted by this court’s decision in Xi v. INS, 298 F.3d 832 (9th Cir.2002). The INS is named as sole respondent in Armentero’s habeas petition. We do not reach the merits of the habeas petition because we conclude that the INS is not an appropriate respondent in these proceedings. We therefore remand to the district court with…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ortiz-Sandoval v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Rasul v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- John Doe v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Saravia v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Padilla v. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.