Legal Opinion
Keeble v. Brown
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1954No. Civ. 15618PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
In an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.
Questions Presented
1. Alleged abuse of discretion in permitting amendment of complaint.
2. Was there an executed oral agreement f
3. Should the court have found on depreciation?
Facts
This controversy grew out of a partnership contract between the plaintiff and defendant F. H. Brown * executed in 1945. Defendant was a supervisor and estimator who had been employed by numerous large contractors. Plaintiff was a paving and excavating contractor who owned a large quantity of equipment. Under the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- D. L. Godbey & Sons Construction Co. v. DeaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Smith v. BlodgetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Coonan v. LoewenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Genger v. AlbersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Dressler v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Van De Kamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- MacIsaac & Menke Co. v. Cardox Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Coldwell Banker & Co. v. Pepper Tree Office Center AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Low v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Eluschuk v. Chemical Engineers Termite Control, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.