Coonan v. Loewenthal
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
On the trial of the main case (S. F. No. 1343) plaintiff’s counsel asked leave of the court to amend his complaint in certain particulars, and, there being no objection, the court allowed the amendment to be made. The amendment consisted in changing one to four in the second count, so that the claim for services would be four thousand seven hundred and fifty dollars, instead of seventeen hundred and fifty "dollars, and the prayer of the complaint was also amended to correspond with such change. The amendment was made on the original complaint on file, by writing over the former words and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Board of Commissioners (No. 2) v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Mott v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Sullivan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- State v. TurlokMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Bigsby v. EppsteinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.