Legal Opinion

Siebel v. Mittlesteadt

California Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2007No. S125590PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

Here we consider what constitutes a favorable termination of a lawsuit as a predicate for a subsequent malicious prosecution action. We hold that, in this context, a postjudgment settlement constitutes a favorable termination when the malicious prosecution plaintiff received a favorable judgment in the underlying action, and settled without giving up any portion of the judgment in his favor.

Factual and Procedural Background

Initially, Debra Christoffers sued her employer, Siebel Systems, Inc. (SSI), and the company’s chief executive officer, Thomas M. Siebel. Christoffers…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Zamos v. StroudCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Elliot H. Himmelfarb, M.D. v. Tracy R. AllainTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Nunez v. PennisiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Kurz v. Syrus Systems, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Hart v. Darwish, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Fenters v. Yosemite ChevronDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API