Legal Opinion

Pender v. Radin

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1994No. D019373PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TODD, J.

Francine Y. Pender and Gisele Pender (the Penders) appeal a summary judgment on their first amended complaint for malicious prosecution against Irene Radin. The Penders were among three defendants in Radin’s lawsuit for breach of contract, fraud and misrepresentation that was settled when the third defendant paid Radin $25,000 and all parties agreed to waive any claim for attorney fees or costs against the opposing parties. The principal assignment of error deals with whether the settlement of the earlier suit represented a termination in favor of the Penders; the Penders…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Casa Herrera, Inc. v. BeydounCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. HMS Capital, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Ludwig v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Sierra Club Foundation v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Nieto v. Blue Shield of California Life & Health InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API