Siegfried v. Kansas City Star Company
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
RIDGE, Chief Judge.
In response to the order entered herein on December 16,1960, the parties have filed motions “as to what form of judgment, if any, should be entered on the verdict of the jury as returned at the trial” of this case on December 8, 1960.
I have had an opportunity to review the transcripts of proceedings as made at the eleven (11) pre-trial conferences held herein, (944 pages); the partial transcript of testimony adduced at the trial; and notes made during both those cycles of this litigation. No useful purpose can be served by elucidating the study-time given thereto. It is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Central Coal & Coke Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- United States v. Philadelphia & Reading RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Maltz v. SaxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Herman Schwabe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Siegfried v. Kansas City Star Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- 2361 State Corporation v. Sealy, IncorporatedDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
- Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1979
- Fleer Corp. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.