Legal Opinion
2361 State Corporation v. Sealy, Incorporated
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 25, 1967No. 65 C 361PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AUSTIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff 1 sues to recover damages, as provided in Section 4 2 of the Clayton Act, for injuries allegedly sustained as the result of violations by the defendants of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and Section 3 of the Clayton Act. Discovery is virtually complete. After careful consideration of the entire record, it appears at this time that substantial questions of fact remain and that defendants’ motion for summary judgment can be sustained only in part.
The record discloses the following undisputed facts. Defendant Ward is a national retailer of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Bernard Susser v. Carvel Corporation, Carvel Dari-Freeze Stores, Inc., Carvel Stores Realty Corporation, and Eight Other CasesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- The Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corporation, Columbia Pictures Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Meyer Braun, D/B/A Rex the Tailor v. Theodore W. Berenson, D/B/A Gulfgate Shopping CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- The Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.