Legal Opinion

Fleer Corp. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1980No. Civ. A. 75-1803PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

NEWCOMER, District Judge.

Topps Chewing Gum, Inc., is the sole significant manufacturer and seller of baseball cards in the United States. Fleer Corporation, a competing bubble-gum manufacturer, has sued under the antitrust laws to obtain the right to sell baseball cards in competition with Topps, alleging that Topps and the Major League Baseball Players Association have unlawfully restrained trade in baseball cards. After trial of the action, the Court has determined that Topps and the Players Association have restrained trade in the baseball card market…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fleer Corp. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  2. Hawksbill Sea Turtle v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Cardtoons, L.C. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Fleer Corp. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Classen v. WellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API