Legal Opinion

Ito v. Watanabe

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1931No. Docket No. Sac. 4381PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

Plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract by the terms of which plaintiff agreed to sell to defendant an hotel business, furniture and other equipment, and to procure a new lease for him. This action is for the balance of the purchase price. The answer of defendant alleged misrepresentations inducing the making of the contract and partial failure of consideration. It further alleged a notice of rescission and offer to restore the consideration received. In addition the answer set forth a delivery by defendant of an unindorscd certificate of the Yokohama Specie Bank, San Francisco…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paolini v. SulprizioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Zeller v. MilliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Brichetto v. RaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. American Sign Co. v. Electro-Lens Sign Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Pacific Architects Collaborative v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Karapetian v. CarolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Jensen v. Harry H. Culver & Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API