Legal Opinion

American Sign Co. v. Electro-Lens Sign Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 3, 1913No. 15,602PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Action by the American Sign Company against the Electro-Lens Sign Company, and others. On demurrer to defendant’s defense and counterclaim and ‘motion to strike.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN FLEET, District Judge.

[1] The action is to recover on promissory notes made by the defendant corporation and indorsed by its codefendants for deferred payments on the purchase price, under a contract of sale, of certain territorial rights or privileges under patents owned by the plaintiff; ^nd the primary question presented by the demurrer and motion to strike interposed by plaintiff to the answer and cross-complaint is whether in an action at law in this court on a contract not under seal the defense of failure of consideration based on fraud inducing the making of the contract can he…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Buzard v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. United States v. Bitter Root Development Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. George v. TateSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1920
  3. Raytheon Mfg. Co. v. Radio Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
  4. Ito v. WatanabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. McLaughlin v. Chief Consol. Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API