Legal Opinion

Gaier & Stroh Millinery Co. v. Hilliker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1915No. 5293PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from County Court, Rogers County; Walter W. Shaw, Judge. Action by the Gaier & Stroh Millinery Company against Miss Nell Hilliker and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE, C.

This is an action commenced in the county court of Rogers county on the 3d day of December, 1912, by the plaintiff in error against the defendants in error, to recover upon the following promissory note:

“$350.00. ■ St. Louis, Mo., Aug. 1, 1903.
“On or before sixty days after date I promise to pay to the order of Gaier & Stroh Milly Co. three hundred fifty 00/100 dollars, at St. Louis, Mo. Value received with interest at the rate of six per cent, per annum.”

—upon which were certain credits, evidenced by payments, the last of which was made March 8, 1907. Mrs. M. Haas,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shaw v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Clark v. KeithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Ricks v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Pryse Monument Co. v. District Court of Kay CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Pryse Monument Co. v. District Court of Kay CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API