Legal Opinion
Clark v. Keith
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 23, 1924No. 13134PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BUTH, C.
This was an action in ejectment and for rents, brought by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiffs in error, defendants below, and for convenience the parties will be herein designated as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiff in his amended petition alleges Dinah Ishmael was a Seminole freedman opposite roll No. 2621, and was allotted as a part of her distributive share of the lands of the Seminole tribe the following lands in Seminole county, Okla., to wit: N. W. % of the S. W.%, sec. 12, T. 8 N. R. 7 E. That on July 3, 1906. she conveyed same to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Craggs v. EarlsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Shaw v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Robinson v. OwensTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
- Gaier & Stroh Millinery Co. v. HillikerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Doye v. CareySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Smith v. Baptist Foundation of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- House of Norvelle v. Queen Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Smith v. Citizens National Bank in OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.