Pryse Monument Co. v. District Court of Kay County
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentDoolin, Justice
The facts are succinctly stated by the majority.
We are to decide what effect an unap-pealed judgment, rendered in the Industrial Court, has on an injured employee’s right to proceed under 85 O.S.1971 § 12.1 The judg*439ment rendered by the Industrial Court was grounded upon the statutory limit of one year contained in 85 O.S.1971 § 43.2
The majority decides an employee is bound by his election to proceed under § 43 of the Act and that the judgment of the Industrial Court is an “inchoate bar”, to proceeding under § 12 of the Act. To me inchoate means an imperfect, partial or unfinished right or act…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Adams v. Iten Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Oklahoma Furniture Mfg. Co. v. NolenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.