Legal Opinion

Wingler v. . Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 25, 1942PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

Plaintiffs assign error in tbe court’s ruling upon tbeir demurrer to tbe defendants’ cross-bill. They contend tbat, instead of permitting it to remain on tbe docket, tbe cross-action should bave been dismissed. To determine tbe correctness of tbe challenged ruling requires consideration of tbe pleadings in tbe cause. Tbe material matters therein set out may be briefly stated as follows:

Tbe plaintiffs, tbe heirs-at-law of N. Wingler, deceased, and the sole distributees of bis estate, instituted tbeir action against A. R. Miller and M. C. Wingler, tbe administrators of tbe estate, and tbe…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Citizens National Bank v. Angelo Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. PeirceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Burleson v. . BurlesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Town of Wllkesboro v. JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Holland v. . WhittingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Schnepp v. . RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Teague v. Siler City Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Johnston County v. . EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. STANDARD AMUSEMENT COMPANY v. TarkingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Horton v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API