Legal Opinion

Town of Wllkesboro v. Jordan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1937PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

An examination of the allegations of the complaint leads us to the conclusion that the demurrer on the ground of misjoinder of parties, and causes of action should have been sustained. The complaint joins (1) an action on contract by the plaintiffs Harris, Lenderman, and Blevins for the recovery from defendants Jordan, Henderson, Doughton, and Love, as principals, and Bumgarner and Prevette sureties, the different items of salary due the named plaintiffs, according to the condition of the bond attached to the complaint; (2) with an action by plaintiff Eussell Hendren, superintendent of water,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Leach v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Citizens National Bank v. Angelo Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. PeirceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Railroad Co. v. Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Chesson v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Smith v. Greensboro Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Wingler v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Burleson v. . BurlesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Holland v. . WhittingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API