Legal Opinion

Burleson v. . Burleson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 27, 1940PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The plaintiffs are the heirs at law of Sherman Burle-son, deceased, and as such are the owners as tenants in common of all lands of which he died seized and -possessed. In the complaint the plaintiffs describe five separate tracts of land, four of which are located in Cane Creek Township and one in Grassy Creek Township, Mitchell County, and allege that they, as the heirs at law of Sherman Burleson, are the owners thereof.

The lands involved in the controversy between the defendant bank and plaintiff are located in Cane Creek Township. The lands involved in controversy between the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Citizens National Bank v. Angelo Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Shore v. . HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Smith v. Greensboro Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Weaver v. . KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schnepp v. . RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Speed v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Teague v. Siler City Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Wingler v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Fleming v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API