Legal Opinion

Horton v. . Perry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1948PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeaweli., J.

The motion of the appealing defendant to strike out the cross-action against him is based on the rule frequently invoked that only those matters germane to the cause of action asserted in the complaint, and in which all the parties have a community of interest, may be litigated in the same action. Brown v. Coble, 76 N. C., 391; Logan v. Wallis, 76 N. C., 416; Street v. Tuck, 84 N. C., 605; Burns v. Williams, 88 N. C., 159; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 96 N. C., 14, 17, 1 S. E., 648; Montgomery v. Blades, 217 N. C., 654, 9 S. E. (2d), 397; Wingler v. Miller, 221 N. C., 137, 19 S. E. (2d), 247; Beam…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Abbitt v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Montgomery v. . BladesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Bowman v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Gibson v. . BarbourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. Brown v. . CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kanoy v. HinshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Gibbs v. Carolina Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Norris v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Wright's Clothing Store, Inc. v. Ellis Stone & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Bell v. LaceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API