Holland v. . Whittington
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevxn, J.
The demurrers to the second cause of action alleged in the complaint were sustained by the court below upon two grounds: (1) That facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action on account of fraud were not alleged, and (2) that there was a misjoinder of parties and causes of action. The plaintiffs assign error in the ruling of the court, and bring the question here for review. This requires an examination of the allegations of the amended complaint challenged by the demurrers.
The plaintiffs are'W. P. Holland and wife, Annie Holland, and Martha Holland. In the first cause of action they…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Leach v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Citizens National Bank v. Angelo Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. PeirceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Rose v. Fremont Warehouse & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Teague v. Siler City Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Wingler v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Burleson v. . BurlesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Davis v. . WhitehurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Snotherly v. JenretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.