Proctor v. Hansel
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.
-The app~11ee is an osteopathic physician, and has been engaged in the practice of his profession in the city of Ames since 1899. The appellant is also an osteopathic physician, and a much younger man than the appellee. He graduated in 1924, and practiced his profession in Story City, about 12 miles distant from Ames. On the 31st of December, 1925, the parties entered into a written agreement, by which the appellee was to furnish suitable quarters and equipment for the practice of their profession, and the appellant was to pay to the appellee 30 per cent of all fees derived from the practice…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Granger v. CravenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- H. W. Gossard Co. v. CrosbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Freudenthal v. EspeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- Styles v. LyonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Beatty v. CobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. American Medical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Foltz v. StruxnessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance v. EricksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- Marshall v. CovingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Bradford v. BillingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.