Legal Opinion
Granger v. Craven
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 9, 1924No. 23,895PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Defendant appeals from an order granting a temporary injunction restraining him “from engaging in the practice of medicine and surgery, or any of the branches thereof, either directly or indirectly * * * in the city of Rochester, Minnesota, or within twenty miles thereof.”
Both plaintiff and defendant are physicians and surgeons. For nearly 30 years, plaintiff has been engaged in the practice of his profession in Rochester, a city of not over 20,000 population. There and in the adjacent territory he has an extensive practice. For some time it has been his custom to employ other physicians and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Menter Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Eureka Laundry Co. v. LongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- James Quirk Milling Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- National Benefit Co. v. Union Hospital Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
- Bauer v. SawyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Robert E. Hedberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Worrie v. ChristineSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.