H. W. Gossard Co. v. Crosby
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Court.— Hon. J. L. Kennedy, Judge. The opinion states tbe case.—
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
The petition, which is in equity, alleges that plaintiff is a corporation doing business in Chicago, 111., as a manufacturer and wholesale and retail dealer in ladies’ corsets, and in the importation and sale of trimmings, laces, silks, and dress furnishings, and that its sales of said merchandise are and have been largely carried on by and through the agency of traveling representatives; that on October 5, 1904, the plaintiff entered into a written contract with the defendant whereby said defendant undertook to work for the plaintiff for a period of three years as corset saleswoman and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. LajoieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Arthur v. OakesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Ormsby v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Richmond v. Dubuque & Sioux City R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Condon Auto Sales & Service, Inc. v. CrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- E. W. Bliss Company v. Struthers-Dunn, Inc., P. G. Bartlett, L. K. Clark, D. E. Henry and J. A. DingesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Wireless Specialty Apparatus Co. v. Mica Condenser Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Eureka Laundry Co. v. LongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.