Legal Opinion
Von Koenig v. Snapple Beverage Corp.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 10, 2010No. 2:09-cv-00606 FCD EFBPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR., District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant Snapple Beverage Corporation’s (“Snapple” or “defendant”) motion to dismiss plaintiffs Frances Von Koenig (“Von Koenig”) and Gay Cadwell’s (“Cadwell”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) Corrected Consolidated Class Action Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b). Plaintiffs oppose the motion. For the reasons set forth below, 1 defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
BACKGROUND
Defendant Snapple is in the business of producing and uniformly…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Reid v. Johnson & Johnson & McNeil Nutritionals, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Brown v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- O'Hara v. Diageo-Guinness, USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- In Re Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.