Legal Opinion
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Board of Regents of the University of Washington
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 3, 2003No. 02-1610PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a patent interference proceeding before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”). The Board granted the Board of Regents of the University of Washington’s (“UW’s”) motion declaring that no interference-in-fact existed on the grounds that the invention of the corresponding claims of U.S. Reissue Application No. 09/185,663 (“the '663 reissue application”) to Eli Lilly & Co. (“Lilly”) are separately patentable over that of U.S. Patent No. 5,302,529 (“the '529 patent”) assigned to UW.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Microsoft Corporation v. Proxyconn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Star Fruits s.n.c. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Redline Detection, LLC v. Star Envirotech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. v. Pamlab, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.