Legal Opinion
Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. v. Pamlab, L.L.C.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 17, 2005No. 2004-1405PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. (Upsher-Smith) is the assignee of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,932,624 (issued Aug. 3, 1999) and 6,605,646 (issued Aug. 12, 2003) (’624 and ’646 patents, respectively) for vitamin supplement compositions. Upsher-Smith asserted claims 1, 2, 5, and 8-10 of the ’624 patent and claims 1-7 of the ’646 patent against Pan American Laboratories, L.L.C. and Pamlab, L.L.C. (collectively Pamlab). 1 In two orders, the district court granted summary judgment to Pamlab, finding the asserted claims of the ’624 and ’646 patents invalid for anticipation and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celeritas Technologies, Ltd., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Rockwell International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Atlas Powder Company, and Hanex Products, Inc. v. Ireco Incorporated and Ici Explosives Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Peters v. Active Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. And Athena Neurosciences, Inc. v. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and ResearchCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Microsoft Corporation v. Biscotti, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Prolitec, Inc. v. Scentair Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Nextec Applications v. BROOKWOOD COMPANIES, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.