Legal Opinion

McCartney v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications

California Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1974No. L.A. 30217PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

We issued a writ of review in response to the petition of Judge James J. McCartney, filed pursuant to rule 920 of the California Rules of Court, 1 that we modify or reject the recommendation of the Commission on Judicial Qualifications (hereinafter the Commission) that he be removed from office. 2 Judge McCartney contends that the Commission has denied him procedural due process, that the charges of misconduct against him have not been sufficiently proven, and that any proven misconduct should be mitigated by his inexperience in office or as a justifiable response to an…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. People v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Spruance v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Mosk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Copley Press, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API