Legal Opinion

Beran v. Harris

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1949No. Civ. 3766PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

This action was brought to compel defendants to reconvey to plaintiffs a certain lot in the county of Fresno, or in the alternative, for a permanent injunction restraining defendants from using the property for any purpose except a service station and residence.

On January 1,1947, an option was given by plaintiff Sidney S. Beran to defendant Doyle A. Harris for the purchase of the property which is the subject of this action. The option contained, among other things, the following provisions:

“Building Setbacks: Permanent residence must be set back sixty (60) feet from center of road right of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Wing v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Warner Bros. Pictures v. BrodelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Fitzgerald v. County of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Rosecrans v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Biescar v. Czechoslovak-PatronatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Springmeyer v. City of South Lake TahoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Aldan-Pierce v. MafnasSupreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands · 1991
  5. Purdy v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API