Legal Opinion

Aldan-Pierce v. Mafnas

Supreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands

Decided July 5, 1991No. APPEAL NO. 89-003; CIVIL ACTION NO. 86-86Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DELA CRUZ, Chief Justice:

We are presented in this appeal with the issue of whether the *129exercise of an option agreement ("option") to purchase real property in the Commonwealth violated the land alienation restriction of Article XII of the NMI Constitution ("Article XII") if persons who are not of Northern Marianas descent thereby acquired an equitable fee interest in the land.2

I

The defendant, Leocadio C. Mafnas ("Mafnas"), appeals a summary judgment order compelling specific performance' of the option. Aldan-Pierce v. Mafnas, Civil Action No. 86-86 (N.M.I. Tr. Ct. Oct. 15, 1986)…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. American Federation of Labor v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. SlavinWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Zakaessian v. ZakaessianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Becchelli v. BecchelliArizona Supreme Court · 1973

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API