Kendall v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.
The prohibition against double jeopardy, an important protection provided by the federal Constitution and our common law, precludes further prosecution of a defendant on a charge following an acquittal on that charge. That protection is triggered not only by a properly-labeled “acquittal” but also by a “ruling of the judge, whatever its label, [that] actually represents a resolution, correct or not, of some or all of the factual elements of the offense charged.”1
*480Applying the principle that the substance of a decision controls for double jeopardy purposes, our Court has held that a putative…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HamptonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Snyder v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- State v. FennellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- State v. SmithCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.