Legal Opinion

State v. Fennell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 17, 2013No. Misc. Docket AG No. 72PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

The Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution, as well as Maryland common law, protects a defendant from being subject twice to criminal proceedings for the same offense. U.S. Const. amend. V; Hubbard v. State, 395 Md. 73, 91-92, 909 A.2d 270, 280-81 (2006). Where a mistrial is declared because of manifest necessity, however, retrial is not prohibited. Hubbard, 395 Md. at 89, 909 A.2d at 279.

Prior to the conclusion of jury deliberations in the present case in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, the jury sent an unsolicited, completed verdict sheet to the trial judge…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Givens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  2. Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  4. State v. SaylesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Quinones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API