Legal Opinion

State v. Hampton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2012No. 2011-1473PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} The issue in this appeal is whether a judgment of a court purporting to grant an acquittal based on lack of venue is a “final verdict” as that term is defined in R.C. 2945.67(A), which authorizes the state to appeal certain trial court decisions either as a matter of right or by leave of court. In accordance with well-established case law, the Tenth District Court of Appeals concluded here that the order purporting to acquit Emmanuel Hampton for failure to establish venue was a final verdict and could not be appealed. We affirm the court of appeals’ judgment.

{¶ 2} The failure to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. People v. PoseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Morrison v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. BrentlingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. Straley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. United States v. Errol KingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API