State v. Smith
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
State of Maryland v. Karl Smith, No. 2094, September Term, 2018. Opinion by Fader, C.J. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — PLEA AGREEMENTS — MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENTS OF ACQUITTAL A trial court has no authority to grant a motion for judgment of acquittal during a pretrial hearing convened to decide whether to approve a plea agreement in a criminal case. If the court finds that a factual basis for the plea is lacking or otherwise finds the plea agreement deficient, then its options are as specified in Rules 4-242 and 4-243. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — COMMON LAW — DOUBLE JEOPARDY Double jeopardy principles do not bar…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Belton & Worsley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Belton & Worsley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Davis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- Santana v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2026
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022