Legal Opinion

State v. Troiani

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1924No. 17876PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of being a jointist and claims that the trial court was in error in failing to give the following requested instruction.:

“I charge you that the testimony of an accomplice comes from a polluted source, and that while the rule of law is that a defendant may be convicted on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, where the honest judgment is satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt, still a jury should act upon such testimony with great care and caution and subject it to careful examination in the light of other evidence in the case. The jury should not convict upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PearsonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. StappWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. SimpsonWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State v. GrossWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. SmileyWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API