Legal Opinion

State v. Smiley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1932No. 23459. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The defendant, Smiley, was, by information filed in the superior court for King county, charged with being a common gambler, as follows:

“He, said Joe Smiley, in the county of King, state of Washington, on or about the 2nd day of May A. D., 1931, wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously did open up, conduct, carry on and operate as owner, agent, dealer, clerk and employee, in that certain building known as 172 Washington street, in the city of Seattle, said county and state, a gambling game and game of chance commonly known as poker played with cards, whereby money and its representative thereof,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. . BrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. State v. WakelyMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Prendergast v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. State v. BurnsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. GaaschWashington Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. State v. ChitwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State v. KnizekWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Washington v. SylviaWashington Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API