Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 19, 1956No. 20PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bramhall, J.;

The principal questions raised by this appeal relate to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction and to the charge of the court in certain respects on the law of accomplices.

Appellant was indicted and tried for robbery alleged to have been committed by appellant and two other young men upon one Edgar Megginson. The jury found appellant guilty. Appellant appealed.

The substantial facts, concerning which there was little or no dispute, are as follows:

On the evening of January 3, 1956, appellant and two other young men, Wesley Johnson and Christian O. Walls, met…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Cupps v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State v. SoltauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. State v. HaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bland v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  2. Derrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  3. Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API