Legal Opinion

State v. Pearson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1905No. 5460PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Okanogan county, Martin J., entered May 23, 1904, upon a trial and conviction of the crime of cattle stealing.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

The appellant, James Pearson, was convicted of the crime of stealing cattle, was sentenced to a term of five years in the penitentiary, and appeals to this court.

Respondent presents a motion to strike the statement of facts, for the reason that the same was not filed and served within the time required by law. The record shows that a proper extension of time for filing the statement had been obtained, and that the statement was filed and served within such extended time. The motion is therefore denied. A motion is also made to strike appellant’s brief, for the reason that the same was neither…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. The People v. . EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Haskins v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. State v. CoatesWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. State v. ConcannonWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. BaddaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. WappensteinWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State v. HayeWashington Supreme Court · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API