Legal Opinion

Lozada v. Barnhart

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 2004No. CIV.A. 02-3666PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBRENO, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying plaintiff Raphaela Lozada’s claim for Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Before this court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge recommending that the court grant Defendant’s motion and deny Plaintiffs motion, and Plaintiffs objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

Lozada has raised four purported objections, 1 namely that the Magistrate Judge erred in recommending…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Evelyn Plummer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Tommaso Fargnoli v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sollon v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Barton v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
  3. Ramos v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. AGUDO-MARTINEZ v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006
  5. DEANGELO, JR. v. SAULDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API