Sollon v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
STANDISH, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (“Ohio Casualty”) and by The Hartford Life Insurance Company (“Hartford.”) (See Docket Nos. 41 and 43, respectively.) The Motion by Ohio Casualty is granted in its entirety; the Motion by Hartford is granted in part. This matter is remanded for further consideration in light of the discussion which follows.
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Factual Background 1
Beginning in July 1974, Plaintiff William D. Sollon was employed by Defendant Ohio Casualty, a property casualty…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lamanna v. Special Agents Mutual Benefits Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Potts v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Lichtenstein v. University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Lichtenstein v. UNIV. OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTERDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011