Legal Opinion

Bennett v. T-Mobile USA Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 22, 2024No. 2:22-cv-01805Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 TARA BENNETT and EDWARD CASE NO. 2:22-cv-01805-LK 11 POLHILL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 12 COMPEL ARBITRATION AND Plaintiffs, STAY CASE 13 v. 14 T-MOBILE USA, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.’s Motion to Compel 18 Arbitration and Stay Case. Dkt. No. 14. Plaintiffs Tara Bennett and Edward Polhill oppose the 19 motion. Dkt. Nos. 20, 28. For the reasons stated herein, the Court grants…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API