Legal Opinion

Aman Truck Lines, LLC v. MST Insurance Services, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 29, 2026No. 2:21-cv-01279Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMAN TRUCK LINES, LLC, No. 2:21-cv-01279-DJC-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MST INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 In June 2025, Plaintiff Valley National Bank obtained a judgment against 19 Defendant Aman Truck Lines, LLC, for breach of contract of an underlying finance 20 agreement. Plaintiff now moves for attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to Federal Rule 21 of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2). (Mot. (ECF No. 72).) As explained below, the Motion is 22 GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 23…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. United Steelworkers v. Phelps Dodge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API