Legal Opinion

Evans v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 13510PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiff, a fireman employed by the City of Los Angeles, was injured in the line of duty by reason of the negligence of defendant’s employees operating a street-car. He was incapacitated, but under the terms of a city ordinance his full salary of $200 a month was paid. Medical and hospital treatment was also furnished him by the city. Plaintiff made no claim for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, but brought an action for damages against defendant Los Angeles Railway Corporation. The city intervened, seeking a lien upon any judgment for sums paid to plaintiff, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. WildeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. City of Oakland v. LyckbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. City of Sacramento v. Central California Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Heaton v. KerlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. City of Costa Mesa v. McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Hawthorn v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. City of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Herrera v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API