Legal Opinion
City of Oakland v. Lyckberg
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 20, 1928No. Docket No. 6362PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
On the eighteenth day of February, 1926, Neis G. Rosen was duly appointed, qualified, and acting police officer in the City of Oakland; on that date at about 4:30 P. M. he was injured by being knocked down by an automobile driven by the defendant; thereafter the plaintiff paid $172,50 for medical and surgical treatment, hospital and nurse bills, drugs, X-rays and surgical appliances and it also paid Rosen $607.37, being the full amount of his salary during the time that he was disabled and did not report for work; thereafter it commenced this action to recover the moneys so expended; the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People ex rel. Dorsey v. SmythCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Noble v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Patton v. Board of Health Etc.California Supreme Court · 1899
- W. States Gas & Elec. Co. v. Bayside Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- City of Sacramento v. Central California Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- County of Madera v. GendronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Hawthorn v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Board of Administration v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Estrada v. Indemnity Insurance of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.